Showing posts with label against. Show all posts
Showing posts with label against. Show all posts

Saturday, 9 July 2011

Buffett Bets 'Very Heavily' Against Double Dip - Bloomberg

Warren Buffett


Warren Buffett, chairman and chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., arrives for a morning session at the Allen & Co. Media and Technology Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho. Photographer: Matthew Staver/Bloomberg



Warren Buffett on U.S. Housing, Employment, Economy


July 8 (Bloomberg) -- Warren Buffett, chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., talks about the outlook for the U.S. housing market and employment. Buffett, speaking with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television's "In the Loop," also discusses President Barack Obama's policies and continued negotiations on a U.S. deficit plan. The speak from the Allen & Co. conference in Sun Valley, Idaho. (This is an excerpt of the full interview. Source: Bloomberg)



Buffett Says ‘Bet Heavily' Against Double-Dip Recession


July 8 (Bloomberg) -- Warren Buffett, chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., talks about the debt ceiling debate and the U.S. economy. Buffett, speaking with Betty Liu on Bloomberg Television's "In the Loop," also discusses his views on acquisitions, the labor market and Todd Combs. (Source: Bloomberg)



Warren Buffett


Warren Buffett, chairman and chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., speaks during an interview with Bloomberg Television on the sidelines of the Allen & Co. Media and Technology Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho on July 8, 2011. Photographer: Scott Eells/Bloomberg



Billionaire Warren Buffett said he is wagering on continued economic expansion and doesn’t expect a second recession.


“I would bet very heavily against that,” Buffett told Bloomberg Television’s Betty Liu on the “In the Loop” program today after data showed slowing U.S. job growth. “How fast the recovery will come, I don’t know. I see nothing that indicates any kind of a double dip.”


The unemployment rate unexpectedly climbed to 9.2 percent in June, the highest level this year, and hiring by companies was the weakest since May 2010, Labor Department data showed. U.S. employers added 18,000 jobs last month, less than the 105,000 median estimate in a Bloomberg News survey.


“It means that we’re still a ways off from getting to where we should be,” Buffett said in the interview, in Sun Valley, Idaho. “We’re seeing growth around the world, but it’s not mushrooming.”


Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK/A) added about 3,000 jobs last year after cutting more than 20,000 positions in 2009. The Omaha, Nebraska-based company employed about 260,000 people at units from insurance and shipping to consumer goods and energy, Berkshire said in February. Employment gained last year at Berkshire units including car insurer Geico and railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe. Staffing fell at carpet-maker Shaw Industries.


“Jobs come with demand,” Buffett, 80, said today. “We’re seeing demand a lot of places but we’re not seeing it in the construction field.”


Berkshire owns a real estate brokerage, a maker of manufactured homes and units that construct roofs and sell bricks and carpet. Buffett said in February that a housing recovery would begin “within a year or so” and that he’s preparing the company’s businesses for growth. Buffett is chairman and chief executive officer of Berkshire.


Berkshire expanded its Acme Brick unit with a $50 million acquisition, and Johns Manville, the roofing subsidiary, is building a $55 million plant in Ohio, Buffett said in his annual letter. Shaw will spend $210 million on plant and equipment this year, Buffett said.


“We will come back big time on employment when residential construction comes back,” Buffett said. The unemployment rate will drop to 6 percent “within a few years,” he said.


To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net


To contact the editor responsible for this story: Dan Kraut at dkraut2@bloomberg.net


View the original article here

Saturday, 2 July 2011

Samsung drops a patent-infringement counter-suit against Apple

Saturday, July 2, 2011 · 11:25 am · 12 Comments

“Samsung Electronics Co. dropped a patent-infringement suit against Apple Inc. (AAPL), filed at a U.S. federal court in April in response to allegations its Galaxy products copied the iPhone and iPad,” Bomi Lim reports for Bloomberg.

“Samsung Electronics dropped the suit on June 30 ‘to streamline the legal proceedings,’ Nam Ki Yung, a spokesman for the Suwon, South Korea-based company, said today in a telephone interview,” Lim reports. “Samsung will continue to defend its patent rights through a counter-claim in an earlier suit Apple filed at the same court in San Jose, California, he said.”

Advertisement: Students, parents and Faculty save up to $200 on a new Mac.

Lim reports, “Litigation between the two companies, which compete in the mobile-device market, is under way in at least five countries including South Korea, Japan, Germany and the U.K. Withdrawal of the California suit won’t affect other U.S. cases or patent- violation complaints Samsung raised against Apple in other countries, Nam said.”

Read more in the full article here.

Related articles:
Apple files preliminary injunction in U.S. against Samsung Infuse 4G, Galaxy S 4G, Droid Charge, Galaxy Tab 10.1 – July 2, 2011
Samsung scoffs at Apple in California lawsuit defense filing – July 1, 2011
Samsung files U.S. ITC complaint against Apple: Long-time partners heading for ugly divorce? – June 29, 2011
Apple sues Samsung in South Korea in patent fight – June 24, 2011
Judge denies Samsung request to see Apple iPhone 5, iPad 3 – June 22, 2011
Samsung denies negotiating with Apple over iPhone and iPad infringement – June 20, 2011
Apple and Samsung executives in talks on patent lawsuits – June 18, 2011
Apple amends complaint against Samsung, asserts more IP rights against more products – June 17, 2011
Apple feels ‘harassed’ by ‘copyist’ Samsung’s demands iPhone 5 and iPad 3 previews; showdown on Friday – June 14, 2011
Samsung seeks court order to see Apple’s next-gen iPhone, iPad samples in patent dispute – May 31, 2011
Judge orders Samsung to hand over five unreleased Android phones, tablets to Apple – May 24, 2011
Samsung files new lawsuit against Apple in U.S. – April 29, 2011
Samsung phone sales drop 14%, profit drops 30% – April 29, 2011
NPD: Apple iPhone 4 for Verizon best-selling mobile phone in U.S.; causes Android to lose share for first time since Q209 – April 28, 2011
Samsung’s new Galaxy S phone shows few changes from model that prompted Apple lawsuit – April 28, 2011
Samsung countersues Apple over iPhone, iPad; lawsuits filed in South Korea, Japan and Germany – April 22, 2011
Apple lawsuit against Samsung deemed no threat to supply – April 19, 2011
Apple v. Samsung: a complete lawsuit analysis – April 19, 2011
Samsung vows to countersue Apple over patent suit – April 19, 2011
Why Apple is suing Samsung and why Samsung will likely settle – April 19, 2011
Apple to Samsung: ‘Blatant copying is wrong’ – April 18, 2011
Apple sues Samsung for attempting to copy look and feel of iPhone, iPad – April 18, 2011
Samsung’s ‘Instinct’ is obviously to make Apple iPhone knockoffs – April 1, 2008


View the original article here

Apple files preliminary injunction in U.S. against Samsung Infuse 4G, Galaxy S 4G, Droid Charge, Galaxy Tab 10.1

Saturday, July 2, 2011 · 10:21 am · 19 Comments

“Right before a long weekend in the U.S. (due to Independence Day on Monday), Apple attempts a hole-in-one in its legal spat with Samsung. Apple has filed (with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California) a motion for a preliminary injunction,” Florian Mueller reports for FOSS Patents.

“The motion targets the following four Samsung products: Infuse 4G, Galaxy S 4G, Droid Charge, and Galaxy Tab 10.1.,” Mueller reports. “Shooting for a preliminary injunction is a bold gamble for Apple. If Apple’s motion is granted, Samsung will be forced within a matter of a few months — possibly less than two months — to take it flagship Android-based products from the U.S. market. Just the possibility of this happening could lead Samsung to settle with Apple early on. But if Samsung doesn’t cave and Apple’s motion fails, Apple’s position will look weak… It’s important to consider that a court grants a preliminary injunction only if there’s a really strong and convincing case.”

Read more in the full article here.


View the original article here